277
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 12 points 1 year ago

The SMNR format suffers from being small and therefore difficult to be cost effective and that renewables are 4 times as cheap. Not easy to make money in this environment. https://cleantechnica.com/2023/11/06/nuclear-energy-free-market-capitalism-arent-compatible/

[-] scratchee@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, one justification I’d heard was that it was a cheap and low risk way to revive the industry enough for bigger projects, but I’m not sure that’s particularly compelling.

[-] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Sounds like a very expensive argument to invest billions on the hope that something might happen 😬. Hope it’s not my money.

[-] scratchee@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, but also literally every industry starts that way. Start small and scale up. Nuclear’s special because we did it once and then almost completely stopped building them globally for so long that the capability faded away.

The tech shifted in the meantime, so even the knowledge that was preserved is for designs we wouldn’t want to build today.

It’s a weird situation.

this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
277 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59381 readers
1686 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS