498
submitted 1 year ago by GiddyGap@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LouNeko@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

From the article it sounds like there were two people randomly shooting at a car. It's plausible that the other guy just gave him one if his guns.

[-] Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 year ago

Either way and my point still stands. It's fucking insanity.

[-] MTLion3@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago

Well when Americans INSIST that rootin tootin point and shootin is the only way, then yeah - this shit is gonna keep happening. I’m all about better gun laws, but you’d think I’m growing devil horns when I talk about it

[-] LouNeko@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I completely agree.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 13 points 1 year ago

Shouldn't it be a crime to give a loaded gun to someone who is mentally incompetent to stand trial?

[-] yenahmik@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Why is someone who is not mentally competent enough to stand trial allowed to return to society? He should have been under medical supervision, not wandering the streets.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

That costs money. If we spent money on medical needs, who would fund the war machine?

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

There are more guns than people in this country. Even if you banned their sale entirely there will still be plenty to go around.

[-] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

For a time. But if you made it illegal to transfer a firearm by any means and set up a buy-back program where when gun owners died the government would claim the guns and provide fair compensation to the estate you could get rid of the guns without taking anyone's guns away. It would take decades, of course, but every day there would be few guns out there and, importantly, the young people that commit most gun violence would be the people with the hardest time getting and carrying one. You can't expect we'll solve a problem that took decades to metastasize overnight anyway.

So there are solutions. That's just one. We don't solve this problem not because we can't but because we don't have the will to.

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I appreciate your optimism but standing here in red rural America I don’t think it will ever happen. There are an insane amount of guns here with more and more every day.

[-] csprance@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You'd be surprised what people are willing to let go of when they see children in their community being murdered. Doesn't matter what political spectrum you're on. There are major gun safety advocates who used to be 2a Rambo's who lost children and realized how wrong they were. It's just not worth it.

thats the problem with conservatives in the untied states though... their complete lack of empathy means they dont care to change until someone kills their kid

[-] jimbo@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You’d be surprised what people are willing to let go of when they see children in their community being murdered.

LOL, let me tell you about a town in Connecticut called Newtown and how the events there changed absolutely nothing about US gun policies...

[-] csprance@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'd urge you to actually look at the response. Look at the legacy section of the sandy hook shooting. It actually did change the laws in some places in other places it got worse.

theres about 50% of us or more who also feel we should start sooner than later in solving for the gun issue... but now with trump banging his cult drum, and one of those drum beats is the '2nd amendment' were kinda fucked.

it would take a constitutional amendment, which we havent done in a long time... and with as useless as the 2 parties are right now, it wont happen.

[-] csprance@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Trump himself once said "take the guns first then figure it out." One of the only cool things he's said.

[-] scrape@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

More than %50. Gun ownership is %50 for only white males. It is only about %15 for the rest of the country. Only one demographic has a culture of violence.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Until there aren't.

There were more buildings with asbestos in the US than people. Then we fixed it.

[-] jimbo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When in US history was there ever more buildings than people, much less buildings with asbestos?

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

Yeah but the founding fathers just forgot to include the freedom to put asbestos in walls in the Constitution!

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Pursuit of happiness, obviously.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Can we really have happiness without asbestos? 🤔

this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
498 points (97.5% liked)

News

23259 readers
1616 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS