603

UFC star Paige VanZant said OnlyFans allows her to make 'life-changing money'

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

She's making 50k a year + payouts from her fights.

Assuming a 100k win bonus (it's actually closer to 400 if you believe random books blogs and Internet rumors) even on the low side shes already made 1M in the past 5 years or so.

Again estimating in their favor let's say 60% of that goes to get camp and taxes. 125k a year for 3 fights is more than reasonable. It's likely she is making more than that however.

She isn't very popular and would never be able to support her own card. She's also used her popularity to get on network TV, and rake in a few million by getting laid. It's not even porn shoots. It's her own terms and partners.

I'm not going to shed a tear for her. She's set for life with any form of reasonable money management and clearly has leveraged her popularity from UFC and done well for herself.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

If true, how much did she make in 24h on OnlyFans. She said it's more than her entire career. I can't believe she made over 1M in 1 day on OnlyFans.

[-] Hardeehar@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

You underestimate the power of thirst

[-] StillWatersPony@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's just 100k people paying 10 bucks each. It sounds like a lot of money but when you think about the numbers involved it gets really quite reasonable for someone in her position to do

[-] Hoomod@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I'm forgetting which UK news channel it was but they had a successful OF person on, tried the "what will your kids think of you" and she replied "they can cry about it in a Ferrari"

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It’s not even porn shoots. It’s her own terms and partners.

To somebody who doesn't know the industry, can you explain to me why that matters in any way?

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 11 points 1 year ago

There’s probably a subtle difference between “exploiting yourself” and getting most of the money after OF fees, vs getting paid essentially minimum wage for a shoot which then gets repeatedly repackaged and distributed for the company that makes way more money off it than you ever did. Which on one hand is essentially the same as being any other actress, but also not remotely the same considering the material, and how many women regret being convinced to take part in it because of exposure and social backlash.

[-] LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Would you like to shoot porn when someone you love and trust or a random person?

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Would you like to shoot porn when someone you love and trust or a random person?

For me personally it would honestly depend on if it was for work or for pleasure.

For others, I have no idea.

My understanding of the original comment I replied to with my question was concerning business/work.

this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
603 points (92.1% liked)

News

23268 readers
1731 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS