571
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

A secret service vehicle likely has fully automatic weapons inside

No one should be leaving weapons and especially full automatic weapons unattended in a god damn vehicle!

...who knows what level of sensitive real time info on presidential movements.

How fucking dumb do you have to be to leave sensitive security information lying around unattended in a vehicle!

It wasn’t just an “unoccupied car” it was a liability that could lead to real danger to the public.

Any vehicle so stuffed with weapons and confidential information that it needs to be defended by lethal force shouldn't be parked and left unattended on a public street! Everything that you've offered isn't justification for lethal force, it's describing behavior so negligent that it would literally rise to the level of CRIMINAL PROSECUTION for any regular person.

[-] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The guns wouldn’t just be laying across the back seat but they have to be stored somewhere. Most law enforcement vehicles have fixed weapon mounts or ways to lock them in the trunk. The problem is that if the vehicle is stolen it takes 5 min with a power tool to get through virtually any vehicle based mount. The locks prevent smash and grabs but with full possession of the vehicle the guns are up for grabs. As for information, an encrypted laptop is one thing but even knowing which frequencies and codes are used that day might be valuable to the wrong person. I don’t know, I’m not USSS but I am an Air Force pilot who has flown them all over the world and been in their cars/limos. I also know how loading military encryption into the jet is and I imagine it’s not too different from their gear. On a side note, when you see a USSS dog in a “do not pet” vest, it’s not illegal to ask to pet it. I have petted sooooo many “do not pet” goodbois.

[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The problem is that if the vehicle is stolen it takes 5 min with a power tool to get through virtually any vehicle based mount.

I'm aware of vehicle mounts and the ease at which firearms can be removed from them. Its why every LE agency I'm aware of has a policy that you can't leave the vehicle unattended with weapons stored in them.

...an encrypted laptop is one thing...

These should not be left in an unattended vehicle. Even a complete moron knows not to leave valuables in a parked car in the D.C. area and the USSS are not morons. They are people and they fuck up occasionally but they are not morons.

I am an Air Force pilot...

Then you should be well aware of the rules regarding the handling of classified information. At the most basic level its not lawful to leave it unattended in any area where someone with insufficient clearance could gain access to it.

The USSS Personnel who discharged their firearm(s) weren't fighting off terrorists or trying to keep weapons or confidential information secure. According to the released details they fucked up and fired when they shouldn't have at suspects who presented no clear danger.

I have petted sooooo many “do not pet” goodbois.

Goodbois deserve all the pets, as long as you have permission. 🙂

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

literally rise to the level of CRIMINAL PROSECUTION for any regular person.

Yeah no shit dude it's the secret service.

You honestly don't want the SS to have guns stashed inside vehicles? Really?

Cmon bud. Think this through.

How fucking dumb do you have to be to leave sensitive security information lying around unattended in a vehicle!

Literally everything about the vehicle is sensitive security information

this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
571 points (94.3% liked)

politics

19145 readers
1779 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS