248
submitted 1 year ago by bboplifa@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Has it seriously not occurred to zionists that there's a middle step between doing absolutely nothing and leveling the entire building? Send troops in there to liberate the hospital. A lot fewer innocents will die, and yea more IDF troops will die that way, but in what fucking universe is it preferable to murder civilians than to run a risky military operation? Even if Hamas kills a bunch of patients or doctors in retaliation there will surely be more survivors than if you just bomb the place. But nope, apparently Israeli lives are worth infinitely more than those of Palestinian civilians, so the best solution is to murder all Palestinians so they're not a "threat" to Israel

[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

When your

best solution is to murder all Palestinians

...bombing hospitals, refugee camps, schools, and endless civilians is a good thing... and explains Israel's behaviour and rhetoric in a pretty straightforward way.

...of course, killing all those kids makes the question "why are Hamas bad" a bit awkward... I know! Saying it's bad to murder children is anti-semitic now - that's not an obvious, massive self-report!

I don't personally care to judge whether Israel or Hamas are worse - they're both monstrous, genocidal murderers, killing innocent civilians... But only one of them has the ability to actually deliver on their genocidal intentions, and they're making headway.

[-] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No sane team lead would accept a mission like that. That's just asking for massive friendly casualties.

Kicking in doors has an extremely high death toll, especially if it's a known base, of course they're going to level it instead of committing a team that's definitely going to get blown up by ied's and killed in ambushes.

In order to effectively suppress and seize that hospital, you're asking that at least 100-200 friendlies die during the operation to take a building that's a known travel route to their tunnels which house thousands of hamas and related fighters and their kit. Given the level of failure of the intel community in Isreal right now, no one operations side is going to take their word that it's safe to send a team into that hospital.

It's a hospital when it's in operation, right now it's a terrorist base of operations SPECIFICALLY because it was a hospital.

See: https://ground.news/article/hamas-has-command-center-under-al-shifa-hospital-us-official-says

[-] EndlessApollo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In otherwords you value the lives of 100-200 IDF soldiers over the lives of many more Palestinian civilians. Considering you probably think 12,000 Palestinian deaths is a proportionate response to 1,200 Israeli deaths that's no surprise

[-] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That was best case scenario from a POV of someone who's done the job. Regardless of your keyboard warrior virtue signaling, no one sane is going to sacrifice their people to save a known terrorist base.

I didn't provide my personal opinion, I provided a description of why your view on the topic is insane.

Edit for clarification: The ELECTED officials of Palestine, HAMAS, their government, has taken their own people hostage and you expect the people who were offering a permanent peace agreement LITERALLY THE DAY BEFORE THE ATTACK, that had their peace party literally interrupted by an act of war by hamas, to sacrifice their own people to save potential attackers pretending to be victims?

[-] snek@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I think it's very misleading how Israel and pro Israelis like to make all humane and heroic actions seem like they are not an option.

NOT destroying the hospital was an option whether you want to send soldiers in there or not.

[-] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com -2 points 1 year ago

I'm not there on the ground so I can't say or prove anything one way or another beyond the articles presented thus far. Mass media hasn't been reliable since AI's were able to pass the turing test last year, hell you or I could even be bots pushing an agenda.

The reality of the situation is that the IDF is under the impression that there is access to the HAMAS tunnels under the hospital which makes the entire hospital enemy territory. They can't enter it for fear of IED's and they can't leave it alone because it's full of enemies.

Personally I'd say implement a cordon with tanks/IFV's and try to run crowd control, but the response back from a higher up would be 'the ied problem'. I don't have a real solution, I'm simply pointing out (to the OG commenter) that their idea is untenable for even T1 groups.

I am hoping that through discussion perhaps a solution will be found, unlikely as it is, but I appreciate different views on the matter.

[-] snek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The reality is that the IDF can't announce an area full of dying patients and doctors and journalists and refugees as that and then start shooting anyone who dares leave, and do absolutely no effort to evacuate them properly, and then offer them a tiny amount of fuel to mock their misery.

Sorry but we are past the point of normal army operation. The only explanation that for me fits is that the goal of the IDF is to ethnically cleanse and genocide Palestinians. Sadly the ethnic cleansing part isn't exactly a secret either thanks to Israeli document leaks, so we know that was a part of the plan all along. This is why Biden and Bibi are having this weird haggle right now about forcibly displacing Palestinians or putting them under an even smaller open air prison.

[-] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com -2 points 1 year ago

I take it then that you didn't follow the majority of our actions either in history or during our engagements in afghanistan and iraq.

[-] snek@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I take it you don't know anything about me and yet decided to throw this in, not sure what it's meant to accomplish. Make me look like I'm not informed.

Well, joke is on you. I'm an Arab, I watched the Iraq war unfold on the news growing up, my father watched it every evening, so I'd say from a very young age I've been keeping up with American (aka "your") actions in Iraq and Afghanistan, especially since they often directly affect life in Jordan (which is where my parents live). Really helps when you speak the language.

So now, are you going to make a real point or just point out things that you assume I don't know shit about?

[-] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com -2 points 1 year ago

I dropped facts that can be easily verified and compared against other facts, you drop an "I'm arab of course I'd know you americunt" But pretending like you 'know' all of it simply because you grew up near it? Hilarious.

Especially given your prior responses which clearly present you either don't know what you're talking about or are being disingenuous in order to muddy the discussion.

[-] snek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not worth the time.

[-] 5BC2E7@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Why can’t any of the countries that are asking that israel don’t bomb the hospitals send their own special forces to rescue the hostages? They have hostages of many nationalities so for example macron could risk the life of french soldiers to minimize palestinian casualties. I don’t get why they have to sacrifice idf soldiers.

[-] snek@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Hmmm should soldiers who already signed off their lived to save civilians die or should the civilians die?

[-] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I mean, they signed off to protect Israelis. If Palestine were Israeli citizens then maybe they'd have some obligation to risk their lives to minimise damage to them but otherwise why should they? Soldiers aren't expected to sacrifice themselves for foreign citizens. Hell some are just brutally sadistic towards them with legal impunity because the citizens of one government have next to no rights in the other aside from whats deemed diplomatically useful and even that is beyond the purview of the average soldier. Theres a reason America switched to using drone strikes on enemy infrastructure instead of sending their soldiers. That has the exact same trade off as well which is more civilian casualties and less soldier casualties. The bad thing here is israel is actively targetting civilian infrastructure and hamas is known to hide in such infrastructure, both things raising the innocent casualty rate immensely.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

A lot fewer innocents will die, and yea more IDF troops will die that way, but in what fucking universe is it preferable to murder civilians than to run a risky military operation?

A lot fewer innocent palestinians. Why do you expect the Israeli government to prioritise the lives of Palestinian over their own citizens when trying to smack out a terrorist threat? I agree wholeheartedly that the attacks must stop and a ceasefire should be declared but comments like this which just present a simple solution and outright ignore the obvious reason that is not happening just distract from conversations we should be having.

[-] mycorrhiza@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Why do you expect the Israeli government to prioritise the lives of Palestinian over their own citizens when trying to smack out a terrorist threat?

Because they were instrumental in creating that terrorist threat in the first place, not only by perpetrating ethnic cleansing but by directly funding Hamas in the 70s and 80s as a counterbalance against the secular PLO.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] firadin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Has it seriously not occurred to zionists that there's a middle step between doing absolutely nothing and leveling the entire building?

But where's the genocide in that?

[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Shouldn't your reasoning mean that we should only sacrifice German, US and British soldiers there?

It is their fault Israel exists like it does now. Every Israeli or Palestinian who dies is an innocent and only US Americans, Germans and Brits should be killed by Hamas.

But what about the reasons for the world wars? So it's actually Italians who should go and die there! Since it was the Romans actions that lead to the situations which evolved into the first world war!

load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
248 points (77.1% liked)

World News

39153 readers
1382 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS