41
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
41 points (91.8% liked)
Open Source
31223 readers
280 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I used to think open source applications were simply the inferior alternative that you choose when you don't have the money for the real thing, but then I started to notice how Blender suddenly looked almost equivalent to the industry standard apps when update 2.8 came out. That made me question my previous position. Fast forward a few years, I now proudly use Linux and FOSS applications whenever I can.
I see this attitude from time to time. At some point a friend asked about a cheaper alternative to Adobe to cut some videos. And I suggested Kdenlive and another alternative (maybe OpenShot) and OBS to record the screen. Yet they chose to use some free version of a gamer screen recorder and I don't know which Videoeditor that just cost $15 or $25. And the result was an ugly watermark from the screenrecorder and cuts and text that looked worse than what I did with Windows Movie Maker in 2003. I'm still puzzled.