-15

Somehow, I feel like the federated network is still centralized, because there is still censorship; it's just distributed across more servers.

I mean, it definitely gives users more rights to free speech, and I'm not worried about privacy issues. However, the removal of content and the banning of accounts are things that are diminishing my passion for sharing my thoughts publicly(on reddit).

I just dont want this happened on here but I am seeing some...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] woshang@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

I don't think you quite understand what 'decentralized' means. Decentralization means there's no central server, implying no data collection, no restrictions or moderation, and no banning.

Furthermore, it won't corrupt when a single node breaks down. This is because a decentralized network is essentially built by all users within the network. Whenever one user quits or a node breaks down, there are always other nodes/users available to maintain the network. That's the essence of a decentralized network.

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Implying no data collection, no restrictions or moderation, and no banning

That is absolutely incorrect. All of those things can and do exist but it is dependent on each instance. There isn’t a single entity controlling those things, each fediverse instance decides for themselves. One instance could collect everything you do, restrict what you post, moderate what users post and comment, and ban users as they please.

Decentralisation doesn’t mean “no rules”

[-] HandwovenConsensus@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I just said that lemmy is not a decentralized network...

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

But it literally is.

[-] mitexleo@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago
[-] HandwovenConsensus@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Because it's polycentric. Each instance is a center. When an instance goes down, it takes all its users and data with it.

I know people around here aren't fond of cryptocurrency, but bitcoin is what I'd consider a truly decentralized system. Nothing is lost to the network when a bitcoin node goes down. As long as you have your private key, you can spend from any node, and you don't even need a node to receive.

I believe it's helpful to distinguish between the two types of systems.

[-] mitexleo@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago
[-] HandwovenConsensus@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for asking. :) Have a good one.

[-] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 1 points 1 year ago

A federated network is inherently decentralized, because the network can continue to operate in a diminished state after a node goes dark. Your local government and electric grid are decentralized.

I think you're mixing up "Decentralized" with "Distributed." A distributed network operates at full capacity as long as at least one node has (the majority of) the network's content. git and torrent are distributed.

[-] HandwovenConsensus@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Well, as long as a distinction is made. I appreciate the information. I still feel that "decentralized" should be replaced with "polycentric," but I'll accept that "decentralized" is the standard term for a system with multiple centers.

[-] woshang@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Lmao, I missed the ‘term’ word, I thought you said is better than decentralized, sry bro

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
-15 points (37.7% liked)

Fediverse

28199 readers
321 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS