1474
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

The company that sold automation to Hitler: "This guy is a step too far"

[-] shadowspirit@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The art of debate and discussion today is watered down to, "...but but that other thing is evil too!"

Can't talk about Uyghurs genocide because European settlers killed natives 500 years ago. IBM and Musk can both be bad. Same as time changes things and people.

Stop distracting from Musk's wrongdoings. What happened 90 years ago was 90 years ago. We can't change that. What we can do is influence change today. Thanks to IBM for not allowing their money to fuel Musk's machines.

[-] OrangeJoe@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I uhhh think it was just a joke...

[-] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I did not know that about IBM's history... 😬

[-] witten@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Probably shouldn't look up any car companies then...

[-] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm familiar with those bits of history already, but wasn't aware of IBM. My dad worked at IBM for 30+ years, so they've always been relevant to my family (they have a dogshit corporate culture, not that that's surprising)

[-] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

apparently they were even manufacturing M1 carbines and BARs for the US

[-] jeremyparker@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

I'm no apologist but literally the country of Germany let that dude do all that shit but we've kinda let the whole country off the hook for that at this point, seeing how it was a really long time ago and the people involved aren't in charge anymore.

Have you seen their offices from the 1970s? It's like wall to wall Eames chairs. IBM deserves another chance.

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, look, you're not wrong. I'm not saying modern IBM is responsible for the holocaust or something like that. But:

  1. It's important that people know the context of this company. Even if the executive team has followed the eightfold path and achieved enlightenment, what the context informs you about is why this should matter to IBM, why they might be responding to Musk.
  2. Corollary to #1, an awful lot of companies took the hint over a year ago and fled Twitter then, so I think we can fairly ask, why does a company with this history not react immediately and in the strongest terms to any hint of white supremacist bullshit. If they want to show us they've changed and should be completely let off the hook, there should be people working there whose entire job is "make sure IBM is never implicated with Nazis again". God knows they can afford it.
  3. The whole interaction gives us something to think about; less about IBM and more about Musk, as in, how low has he sunk that even IBM is finally reacting?
[-] urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Look everyone, a funny observation. Or is this an open invitation for debate?

Please debate me. PLEASE RESPOND.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I think you'll find none of the same executives at IBM in 2023 that were alive in the 30s/40s.

this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
1474 points (97.4% liked)

News

23600 readers
2325 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS