228
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

I was mainly referring to how sluggish it was. For my web apps, it was always slower and the UI would bog down. Maybe not the correct definition of you refer to unnecessary features.

I am more referring to how lean or streamline the software is. Both in front end design and backend.

A lot of browser performance has to do with how you use it, so my experience is not universal.

Still, even full fat Firefox is skinny compared to the morbidly obese Chrome and edge browsers.

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

So weird to me how when Chrome first came out, it was the opposite: Firefox was getting sluggish and poorly optimized with too much going on, and Chrome was sleek and fast and seemed to just have what was needed to work.

[-] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

These things go in cycles. But I think the writing is on the wall. Google will never make the investment to unbloat Chrome.

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

They have no incentive to, at least not as long as they're the dominant web browser

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
228 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

59648 readers
1478 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS