1474
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Whether I’m black or white has no bearing on whether I should be proud of anything outside of my own influence; I’m convinced identity politics gets us nowhere.

When you're born, you aren't just dropped out of the clear blue sky onto a level playing field fully defined by the merits of your own actions. Life isn't a lone survivor video game.

You're born in context: historically, financially, genetically, and otherwise. Some people take pride in their heritage, their lineage, their culture, their traditions, etc etc etc. Just because it isn't your cup of tea and you'd rather only celebrate what you consider to be your own accomplishments (and I say it this way on purpose because without your born context there's no guarantee that your life would've turned out as it did) does not mean everyone views the world the same way.

I think more generically you should ask yourself why it bothers you so much when people celebrate aspects of their identity.

I'd largely have no problem with "white pride" festivals if the concept even made any sense at all (which it doesn't, and which is why it's basically "white power" with a tiny PR tune up), but these "events" are basically just Klan rallies. Versus look at most pride festivals. They're full of people dancing and singing and genuinely celebrating things they have in common with one another (or in some cases, like with gay pride and ally ship, things they simply have an affinity for).

[-] Zozano@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think you may be viewing my thoughts through an uncharitable lens. I am not bothered at all when anyone celebrates any aspect of their identity.

I'm a white Australian; my ancestors committed atrocities, yet, I do not feel shame for their actions, because I wasn't involved. I can only take shame in how I have acted.

To reiterate, the definition of pride is localised to the individual. It doesn't make sense to be proud of someone else's accomplishments if you haven't helped them.

A parent may feel proud if their child has done well, they have contributed to their success. However, if my college in a different department gets a promotion, I shouldn't.

Now extend this to people you don't know, and it makes no sense at all.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To reiterate, the definition of pride is localised to the individual. It doesn’t make sense to be proud of someone else’s accomplishments if you haven’t helped them.

That's just what you think / feel / opine / believe. Pride has many definitions, and people often take pride in their ancestry which they cannot possibly have helped because they didn't exist the entire time they lived their life. Humans aren't fully rational and again, aren't dropped in greenfield without context on a level playing field. Also, you apparently don't feel much pride for your heritage, but you still benefit from it. Your achievements and failures are partially possible and/or caused by your birth situation. If, by birth lottery you were born a Palestinian, you might have died in childhood before ever going to school or college.

A parent may feel proud if their child has done well, they have contributed to their success. However, if my college in a different department gets a promotion, I shouldn’t.

Who are you to tell others that their feelings are valid or invalid?

Ultimately, I'd suggest that you take a look inward because I don't think a lot of your problems with these things stem from a logical place either but also an emotional one. To be human is much more than a fancy calculator, and it's perfectly fine to feel various feelings without them necessarily being rationally justified. There is only, in my opinion of course, a problem when people start to use emotions to justify violence or other forms of abuse.

But life isn't generally, and being human isn't certainly:

I did one good thing = I have earned one smile.

EDIT: Outside and inside and in addition to all of this, I think it's perfectly fine and even kind of justified to feel proud of others because we are all ultimately only members of one race: the human one. I haven't marched at LGBTQ+ pride but it wouldn't bother me to do so if someone genuinely wanted me there for some reason, and I take pride in the positive achievements of lots of other people who I did nothing to help all of the time.

[-] Zozano@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You seem to be assuming a lot about my position, and getting most of it wrong.

My only stance thus far is one of definitions. Yes, I know the definition of "pride" has changed, which I'm trying to illustrate is an issue.

Elon's "white pride" rhetoric stems from nationalism, which stems from the conventional definition of "pride", which is:

a feeling of deep pleasure or satisfaction derived from one's own achievements, the achievements of those with whom one is closely associated, or from qualities or possessions that are widely admired

The pride displayed here is that of perceived inherent superiority, which leads to bigotry.

Rationality and emotion aren't mutually exclusive. Empathy has flaws, it causes people to become hijacked by emotion. Conversely, compassion is a choice, even psychopaths can be convinced behaving compassionately is in their own self interest.

So, I don't accept the assertion that feelings are an acceptable metric for evaluating the validity of a claim. I'm convinced it's wrong to be proud of an identity.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Elon’s “white pride” rhetoric stems from nationalism, which stems from the convention definition of “pride”

You're acting like Elon or a klansman (same picture.gif) sat down and read a dictionary definition and came up with this. He didn't.

Rationality and emotion aren’t mutually exclusive. Empathy has flaws, it causes people to become hijacked by emotion. Conversely, compassion is a choice, even psychopaths can be convinced behaving compassionately is in their own self interest.

Of course they're not mutually exclusive, you were pretending they were by saying someone's "correct" feeling of pride can only be derived from their own achievements.

Rationality is a man made concept. Humans are not purely or perhaps not even mostly rational.

So, I don’t accept the assertion that feelings are an acceptable metric for evaluating the validity of a claim.

What claim are you even talking about? You're the one tossing out claims left and right, like it's morally wrong to go to a pride parade unless you've personally experienced homophobia... Meanwhile you're side stepping the very relevant and obvious thing: that someone acting positively due to unearned pride harms absolutely nobody.

You're getting confused by rhetoric because you're overly concerned about the dictionary definition of co-opted words. Just because it's called white pride and gay pride doesn't mean that the intentions, the events, the attendants, or anything philosophically backing any of it are remotely the same. Straight pride is practically a homophobic hatred event, gay pride is largely a block party with fun and revelry.

[-] Zozano@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

It's evident you're arguing in bad faith. I never claimed its morally wrong to attend a pride parade unless one has experience homophobia. I'm out, peace

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's exactly counter to your main position about how only certain people are allowed to feel pride based upon certain earned criteria. But you do you, bud.

I wish you and people like you weren't so simply fooled by tricks of rhetoric as you are. But not only is that unlikely to change, you're likely to continue thinking you're actually technically correct in some way because you have a dictionary definition of a term and think that's an argument.

White pride != black pride

Straight pride != gay pride

Black lives matter != all lives matter

Edit: y'all are right, these things are exactly the same because they use similar language in their names... That's definitely not what a retrograde shit movement would do to try to lend legitimacy to their bullshit.... That's definitely not similar to what North Korea does by calling itself the "People's Democratic Republic of Korea" or anything. /s

[-] shea@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 1 year ago

you should be a little ashamed that you benefit greatly from their actions. Nobody thinks it's your personal fault, were just trying to get you to see how you have an unfair leg up over your darker skinned counterparts. Nobody wants you to apologize, you yourself didn't do anything. We just want you to understand that it's a little fucked up how your life is easier in general just because you're white, and we want you to try and figure out why that is

[-] Zozano@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Spare me with the condescension. I don't feel ashamed for something I have no control of.

Of course I want the same outcome as you, for people who have been historically discriminated against to have the same opportunities as me.

It is fucked up that things are easier because I won the genetic lottery, and was born male, and straight (mostly).

That being said, I have no obligation to make up for the sins of my fathers. However, I do have a moral obligation to fight injustices to the best of my abilities, this would be the case, regardless of the dice roll of life.

this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
1474 points (97.4% liked)

News

23296 readers
2319 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS