277

This Is Biden’s Soft Landing, and He Deserves Some Credit (newrepublic.com)

submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

174 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The last time this happened, voters didn’t credit Bill Clinton. That may be a bad omen, or a good one.

If the stock market chose presidents, Joe Biden would be a shoo-in for reelection in 2024. The market rallied this month amid growing optimism about the economy, with the S&P 500 zooming 1.9 percent Tuesday on news that the consumer price index rose only 3.2 percent in October (compared to 3.7 percent in September). Stocks rallied again Wednesday on news that the producer price index fell 0.5 percent. Commentators are no longer debating whether the economy will experience a “soft landing” (i.e., a reduction in inflation without recession). The only question now is when it will arrive. The S&P 500 seems to have decided it’s already here.

But the stock market doesn’t choose presidents. Voters do, and polls continue to show they think the economy is in terrible shape. A Financial Times–Michigan Ross Nationwide Survey conducted November 2–7 is absolutely brutal on this point.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, it's not like Democrats have never managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory before. I'm just saying, this is shit tier messaging, and when the whole ass republic is at stake, it sure would be nice to see them actually trying instead of phoning it in with shitty messaging because "the other guy is basically Hitler and we've been doing pretty well".

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dude the other side couldnt get it's shit together enough to keep a speakership in place. What do you expect the Democrats to be doing? It's a miracle the government is funded at all.

This is a result of them trying. Biden's "contribution" here was primarily from democrat-pushed legislation.

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Look, if your point is that "they deserve to use shitty messaging if they want, don't worry about it, bro", well, okay. That's your opinion, and that's fine. I don't think it's a smart choice, politically speaking, and that's where I'm coming from. People are feeling the hurt right now, and I think you're going to find that correcting their complaints with "we should be thanking Biden, actually" is bitter medicine. Maybe they know what they're doing, but somehow this feels familiar from the '16 Clinton Campaign; like they've got permission to fucking phone it in because the other guy is unelectable. I hope you're right and they really do know what they're doing.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

My point is a rebuttal to your insinuation that Democrats are not trying to fix anything or do anything. That's false.

I agree Dems aren't as good at messaging as Republicans.

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023

277 points (86.7% liked)

politics

19135 readers

1142 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News