179
submitted 1 year ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

I'll note that for most purposes, when people talk about going to 2°C above what it was in the late 1800s, they usually are talking about the long-term average, not one-day events.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I thought making it plural made it clear already, but I wasn't just talking about this one article.

I'm also not sure where you got 2 degrees above average for a month? The article is about a single day.

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
179 points (97.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5239 readers
478 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS