1694

Firefox users are reporting an 'artificial' load time on YouTube videos. YouTube says it's part of a plan to make people who use adblockers "experience suboptimal viewing, regardless of the browser they are using."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nfsu2@feddit.cl 71 points 1 year ago

I do not think Google deserves the benefit of the doubt anymore, people need to stop using their services.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

~~Do No Evil~~

Be A Lil Bitch

[-] kattenluik@feddit.nl 8 points 1 year ago

No one's going to unless someone recreates YouTube, which isn't happening anytime soon.

[-] irreticent@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

It's already been recreated (vevo, peertube, etc.) it's just that those services don't have anywhere near the content Youtube has.

[-] nfsu2@feddit.cl 8 points 1 year ago

Thanks fot saving my time answering for all of us

[-] Hovenko@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 1 year ago

Sadly, the problem is that the small platforms tend to attract all the scum that was blocked on YT. You know... all the racist anitisemitic nazi conspiracy theory ridden brains.

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago
  • they don't have Alphabet's backing
[-] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The ad funded model is dying AKA endless free money is dying, it doesn't work because there's no real business there it works based on the empty promise of making money elsewhere on the products they are selling without any guarantee that the advertisement is what's making them the money. The analytics are starting to tell them that it's not as good of an investment as they once thought. Advertisement has become overvalued, that's why people are saying that there is a bubble and that it's going to burst, just like it happened before with the dotcom crash.

In other words a platform like YouTube is already very flawed. Sure you can make alternative video sharing platforms and you can get them by on donations (or maybe even nationalize it in some places) but that money making component for creators isn't something that can be as easily replicated. They can do sponsorships, they can ask for donations, but donations are hardly anything to live by unless you're famous, and sponsorships can have the same problem as the aforementioned over-inflated ad revenue.

[-] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Idk, this one is pretty easily explained by Hanlon's razor. I'm sure others will disagree, which is fine, but it seems not only plausible, but likely that they intended for this to target all ad block users and not just FireFox. Google has waged a war with adblockers, and they are making quick retaliatory changes as the adblockers block the adblocker blockers. It's literally Google making changes and people changing the adblockers back. It genuinely seems more realistic for them to have tried to target all adblockers than just FireFox...

[-] mlg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah except changing your user agent to chrome bypasses the load slowdown lol

Thanks to HTTP being a complete mish mash and meme of protocols and standards, there's no way for google to easily target ad blockers without either significantly changing the entire youtube API, or trying to enforce stupid DRM bullcrappary by updating or pushing for a new web standard.

Even crunchyroll doesn't crackdown on ad block even with DRM playback enabled.

[-] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah except changing your user agent to chrome bypasses the load slowdown lol

Did you test this yourself? Rather than just ask your source, I was going to test it myself. However, I cannot get a slow down at all. Everything is loading instantly and ad-free. Perhaps the servers providing my instance of YouTube don't have the change, I'm not sure, but I have not been able to personally create this. So without a reliable source or evidence, I cannot just take your word for it that changing the user-agent alone fixed the issue.

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Rossmann tested it in latest video. No difference between browsers. And that dude is strong ad block and none Google browser supporter.

[-] Dewded@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Pretty much. Doesn't help that Firefox is the best browser for customizing your browsing experience. So all adblockers are very good on it.

Probably some summer trainee tasked with solving the Firefox + ublock Origin combo made an oopsie.

With all that said: fuck Google for even beginning their crusade against adblockers.

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
1694 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

60047 readers
2017 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS