231
submitted 1 year ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dimok@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

Umm, no. Someone being forced to move to a different location based on accusations is about as silly as firing them over accusations. They can and will file a complaint with the state labor board. Have any of you actually worked before..?

[-] zaph@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Someone being forced to move to a different location based on accusations is about as silly as firing them over accusations

But you were perfectly fine moving the victim??

[-] Dimok@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure you insinuated that Taco Bell should handle criminal harassment in another post, so I'm going to go ahead and just assume you're a troll and not reply.

[-] zaph@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

That's a reply. If by "handle criminal harassment" you mean get authorities involved, absolutely. How is that a question? Not sure what else you could have inferred from that but if it's something else please, do tell.

[-] Dimok@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

So you believe it's taco bells responsibility to get the authorities involved, not the victim?

[-] zaph@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

The company has a responsibility and when the don't fulfill their duties of handling harassment properly the victim can sue the company. Which is exactly what this situation is, taco bell not handling reports of harassment properly and the victim having to do it themselves. You've been talking a lot about people not understanding the US workforce but you're pretending like there aren't laws that cover this.

[-] Dimok@reddthat.com 0 points 1 year ago

Well, I'll go ahead and stick with my own experience over some random dude on the internet. You jumped from harassment, to criminal harassment (yes, these are different levels of harassment), saying taco bell needs to handle criminal levels of harassment, to now not answering the question completely about who has the responsibility to take criminal harassment to the authorities. BTW, my experience is about 15 years in mid and 10 years in upper level management. I'm guessing you read something or talked to some buddies to get your levels of experience.

[-] zaph@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Know how I know you're lying? No one with that much experience thinks that experience alone is worth anything. People hold down jobs for decades that they suck at and you keep repeating yourself as if that's the solution to anything. You also keep talking about dodging questions when you still haven't answered the question I asked you to begin with. You're either a really bad troll or a really bad boss.

[-] Dimok@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago

I ran out of popcorn kid, my give a shits meter of what some rando on the internet thinks regarding my life is at 0. But hey, you do you fella! Ever wonder why you get passed up for any promotions that involve managing people? Because your decisions are a liability to your company! Now you know.

[-] zaph@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

Ever wonder why you get passed up for any promotions that involve managing people?

No because I'm the manager. Nice try though. Also nice try pretending not to care and then proceeding to show you do.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 year ago
[-] Dimok@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

That's cool. When you do get into the workforce, you'll find it's never as black and white as it seems. I've run into just as many people claiming victim when in reality they are the problem. Not saying that is the case with this person, but moving everyone that they claim is harassing them is foolish and leaves your company open to retaliation claims. Now you know.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

I'm over 60 and have worked since I was 12. You don't know shit about my experiences but are arrogant enough to think otherwise.

Now you know.

[-] Dimok@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It doesn't make your terrible ideas any less terrible. So far I've given you several reasons why they are terrible, and you have replied with nonsense about your age as if it's relevant. Hint: It isn't EDIT: Also, I asked you in my post (it was the only question that was asked in the entire post) "Have any of you actually worked before…?" To which you *replied * "Umm, no." So tell me again how I made an assumption and don't know shit about your experiences. I will make one assumption, you've been having trouble with communication ever since you started working at 12.

this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
231 points (98.7% liked)

News

23311 readers
2019 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS