view the rest of the comments
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
This strategy is clever in the short term, given the lines of attack they're leaning on in the information side of the war. What makes no sense though, is those people are exactly what Russia needs to fix its demographics problem.
Those people are population, potential labor and soldiers. Yeah, I understand, they want them to be Russian, not foreigners. But, y'know, Russification is kinda a thing. So, why aren't they integrating this population as a resource and trying to Russify it, and instead just wasting it by using it as a piece for short-term political pressure? And then trying to patch up demographics by asking women to have more kids...?
I mean, in the long term this is just a drop in the bucket of European debates about immigration policy.
Logistically, you are right, Russia is down a population size of about 2 million from the start of the war. Worse is that those are mostly going to be trade skill and factory workers.
That being said, I think Putin is seeing those immigrants as more of an unstable element. In that those migrants might give your population ideas... like separation, leaving too, rebellion, or resistance. Which for a repressed Russia, would be a like lighting a match on a powder keg.
As much as Russia needs the extra manpower, I think Russia can't afford the potential of an insurrection.
They don't want to stay in Russia, that's why. When Belarus sent migrants over their border they specifically promised them they would get them into the EU and flew them out from the middle east.
I rather think it's based on KGB-style misunderstanding of the liberal mindset: The intended goal seems to be either a) cause overload of the asylum system, distracting the country, and/or b) cause internal division in the country, xenophobes vs. liberals. What they just can't fathom is, as happened not just in Poland but also with the rest of Europe's reaction to what the Poles did, c) everyone putting the blame squarely on Russia. Because no matter how much a liberal's heart may bleed what's worse is abusing vulnerable people for your bullshit and discouraging that by putting up a hard front is more important than the fucked situation the people themselves are in because the state of the system is more important than random acts of charity. Really, tl;dr: It's a bad move to negotiate with terrorists. Always.
Just fascists doing fascist things. Don't expect any of it to make sense.
I think it's insane. People are trying to escape the regime and it's being treated like Russia is sending them out on purpose. Let the people leave. They're just people for fucks sake.
These aren't Russian citizens, they're people from elsewhere in the world that ended up in Russia. They're essentially trafficking victims.
If they were Russian citizens, then they could just be conscripted.
So if they're not even Russian then how are they a 'security threat'? Why keep them out?? I'll be honest this just looks like the typical white supremacist anti immigrant bs I usually see from westerners. "When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best." etc
Who said they're a security threat? And why let them in when they're in a country which invited them over? They're Russia's responsibility.
I mean they clearly don't want to be in Russia themselves. Same as how not everyone coming in from Mexico is Mexican.
If this is anything like the Belarus situation (which I assume) then people were brought there on the promise of getting into the EU and, when that didn't materialise, weren't given the opportunity to leave Russia via any other means: They were bussed to the EU border and told to walk towards it and worse:
Also:
Reactions, btw, included Iraq and Turkey suspending flights to Belarus.