127
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thekernel@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

On Windows at least, not sure why you would bother with virtual box now there is either WSL2 or hyper-v VMs

[-] Erikatharsis@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

My friend, I'm planning on switching to desktop Linux, and you sincerely expect me to make rational, informed decisions? /j

/srs It's because I'm an idiot, Jim.

[-] trepX@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

WSL has many issues which are not getting fixed, and rather classified as "won't fix, as out of scope". Further, WSL isn't supported on Windows Server, which is really annoying if you're dealing with M$ only infrastructure at your company and hoping to use WSL as an alternative way of deployment.

It's basically just a "cheapish" way of keeping Devs on Windows, preemting any semblance of competition by Linux desktop environments from forming. They know they lost the server market, but they can cling on to the Desktop environment market as much as possible, at the same time eating into apple's market share in this specific power user market. Not that Apple cares that much anyway, they're content with selling iPhones.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
127 points (90.4% liked)

linuxmemes

20707 readers
1004 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS