92
submitted 11 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Wanderer@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

Guess it's back to electrify everything then.

Induction and heatpumps are the only answer.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 11 months ago

For home heating and cooking, they're definitely a good route.

Ordinary coil stoves are fine to cook on too (I did for decades) but don't meet the need for upper-class signalling in the way that induction does.

[-] Raxiel@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Ordinary coil stoves are fine to cook on too

It's not their effectiveness that's in question, just their efficiency.

Obviously the conversion of electricity > heat is always the same (100%) but induction is better at getting more of that heat into the food rather than the surroundings.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I wonder if geothermal is something they can do there.

It's common in the Nordics and is usually the cheapest way to heat homes.

Last winter electricity was so expensive that district heating won.

But geothermal has otherwise been cheapest.

[-] sonori@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

Most of the time when people suggest heat pumps they mean ground source ones. District cycle heat pumps would be the best solution from a cost and efficiency perspective, but require common action to install new infrastructure and so are harder to get than building level solutions.

Outside of that, unfortunately geothermal electricity tends to be very location and geology dependent. We absolutely should be taking full advantage of it where we can, but there are unfortunately limits on where is practical.

this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
92 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5178 readers
478 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS