361
submitted 2 years ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

What you are describing is deflation and it's only happened twice during the history of the United States. It is also generally looked at as a bad thing.

[-] Jarix@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Is inflation generally looked at as a good thing or a bad thing? Ive only ever heard people complain about inflation.

If they are both bad things im willing to give the bad thing that improves my life a try over the bad thing that makes everything more expensive.

Granted i have nothing so im probably on the side of things that is least effected by the bad side of deflation.

If i can spend more money on the things i want to, it will absolutely help small local businesses near me

[-] pixeltree@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

A small amount of inflation is healthy. You REALLY want to avoid deflation, because that means the value of your money is increasing. If people know their money will be worth more in the future, they won't spend it, incentivized to save and sit on it. That means on average everyone spends less, slowing the economy down and starting into a recession/depression.

Gonna slap this with the good old "I am not an economist" disclaimer, juat what I remember from economics class in high school

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Only problem that right now people also may decide against buying because they can't afford it. Also, I'm not sure world is producing goods at a healthy rate either, more like we've got a bit of an overproduction

[-] pixeltree@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, obviously wages SHOULD be keeping up with inflation and inflation should be a low, stable amount. That's the problem, not inflation in general.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

What you learned in high school puts you miles ahead of 99% of these comments

[-] TangledHyphae@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

People still have to spend money, hoarding wealth makes no sense if you can't eat and pay for services and utilities.

[-] krakenx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The idea is that deflation affects the investor class. Assuming a "healthy" 3% inflation rate, the value of your savings decreases by 3% per year. That means you lose money if you can't invest in something earning more than 3%. Traditionally interest rates have been around 0%, which means bonds and savings accounts also pay 0%. So, your only options to not lose the value of your savings is to invest in the stock market, risky businesses, or real estate.

As a middle class person that means that it mostly affects my 401k, but for millionaires and billionaires, deflation means that they would sit on their hoard instead of investing it. Traditionally that means no funding for new businesses, inventions and ideas, and that's also why the investor class pays much lower taxes than the working classes.

But nowadays "investment" seems to mostly be buying good companies and enshitifying them or bribing politicians, so maybe it would be better if we encouraged the rich to sit on their money instead of using it to make society worse.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

I have no idea what this is in reference to

this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
361 points (97.1% liked)

News

35714 readers
833 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS