269
submitted 1 year ago by Zerush@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 year ago

IME it's way easier to self-host

[-] neshura@bookwormstory.social 51 points 1 year ago

From my personal experience running GitLab and Forgejo (Gitea Drop-In replacement/Fork):

  • Gitea/Forgejo is easier to get running
  • UI is less bloated/faster
  • GitLab redesigned their UI and imo it's shit now
  • No features locked behind a "Pro" Version (Pull or Bidirectional mirrors are for example unavailable on GitLab self-hosted unless you shell out for premium)
  • Gitea Actions is a lot more intuitive than GitLab CI, this is likely personal preference but it's still an important factor
[-] h_a_r_u_k_i@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

Gitlab used to be cute, small, and innovative (as in open). But now it's too bloated. Gitlab CI is not well designed and half-baked.

[-] rolaulten@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago

Hey now! Gitlab ci is totally fine so long as your simply running your build.sh file out of it. Anything more and your risking madness.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
269 points (94.4% liked)

Open Source

31713 readers
104 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS