67
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BatmanAoD@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago

"All leading programming languages...are actually specified in international standards"? Here's an actual list: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Programming_languages_with_an_ISO_standard

Off the top of my head, here are some languages that aren't on there: Java, Python, Perl. Some languages that are on there but almost no one uses: ALGOL-60, CHILL (which appears to be extinct?), MUMPS, and Modula-2. Notably, there's a version of Lisp closely related to Common Lisp, but I've never actually heard of anyone using it.

Of the ones that are on there, most are not actually standards-driven the way C and C++ are, and even those each existed for over a decade and became widely used prior to standardization.

The current latest C# ECMA standard describes version 6.0; the current C# version is 12.0. The ISO spec is even further behind.

Standards don't determine language usage, popularity, or longevity.

this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
67 points (100.0% liked)

Rust

5899 readers
50 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS