109
submitted 2 years ago by m3t00@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lmaydev@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

No they literally state more water was evaporated than heat energy from the light could do by up to 3 times.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

That's assuming some definition of heat that requires light absorbtion. This is still heat, because all motion of atoms is heat.

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
109 points (95.8% liked)

science

20302 readers
90 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS