28
submitted 11 months ago by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/science@beehaw.org

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/4426053

While it's easy to dismiss this as a stunt, history suggests stunts are necessary to shift mindset. This flight alone solves nothing, but it will hopefully move the needle.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frogmint@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

Are the emissions of biofuel any better than fossil fuels?

[-] Thevenin@beehaw.org 3 points 11 months ago

Tailpipe emissions? No. Round-trip emissions? Yes.

Biofuel sucks CO2 from the atmosphere while the plants or algae grow, then releases it again when the fuel is burned. It's net-zero in the literal sense. They only have a GHG footprint if fossil fuels are used during the processing. In the US for example, during the processing of corn into ethanol, they burn natural gas for heat because it's convenient and cheap. So the GHG footprint of American corn ethanol is approximately the same as gasoline.

[-] frogmint@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

Thank you for the excellent explanation, that makes sense.

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
28 points (100.0% liked)

Science

12981 readers
1 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS