38
Unlimited power (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vanZuider@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

That's intentional. So if one part of the code suffers a random mutation and spontaneously develops a bug, the redundant code can still ensure the proper functioning of the program while the bug gets fixed.

Just take care if you merge two branches that contain the same bug; you might end up with a program without functional redundant code. That's why you should never merge closely related branches.

It's how ~~isoforms~~ functions with different signatures evolve. As long as it isn't harmful it tends to stick around. Then the different code may develop adaptations which fit it into a niche if it is a selective advantage for the ~~organism~~ code base.

this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
38 points (86.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

32355 readers
1218 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS