254
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Broadcom is laying off 1,267 Palo Alto-based VMware workers following its acquisition of the company

Chip manufacturer Broadcom wrote the latest chapter in the long story of return-to-office tensions between bosses and employees.

After completing its $69 billion acquisition of cloud computing company VMWare, Broadcom CEO Hock Tan issued a direct order to his new employees about where they must work. “If you live within 50 miles of an office, you get your butt in here,” he told the workers of previously remote-friendly VMWare.

The comments came during a meeting Tan hosted on Tuesday after the merger between the two companies officially closed, following approval from Chinese regulators. Like many other executives, Tan cited in-person work’s benefits to collaboration and company culture. “Collaboration is important and a key part of sustaining a culture with your peers, with your colleagues,” he said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 0xF21D@infosec.pub 59 points 1 year ago

I’m re-evaluating my use of VMWare products now, that’s for sure.

[-] netburnr@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Everything is going to be core based for licensing, and if you aren't in their top 600 customers you will receive worst support. Both of those things have been publicly stated.

[-] 0xF21D@infosec.pub 15 points 1 year ago

Yup. And I have a couple workstation licenses in need of an upgrade purchase that will probably not happen now. Linux KVM is looking more appealing.

[-] aard@kyu.de 4 points 1 year ago

For workstation there hasn't been a need to use VMWare for over a decade now, if you're on Linux. Server side, if you needed live migration you had a reason to stick with VMWare - but that also should've been solved about a decade ago. Pretty much the only two excuses for still using VMWare infrastructure are "it's old infra, and we don't really have the time to migrate away from it" or "our ops team is too incompetent to handle anything else"

[-] 0xF21D@infosec.pub 6 points 1 year ago

For Linux yes I started using KVM and it works just fine for my needs on a workstation.

For Windows hosted VMs I preferred VMWare Workstation. It has a workflow that worked for me and I found it compatible with a wide range of guests. Linux guest support in HyperV is a joke. Virtualbox sucks for professional use because the functionality locked behind the extensions they force you to download is an invitation for Oracle to begin harassing for licensing with the threat of a software audit if you’re big enough a target.

I don’t mean for this to become a Linux vs. Windows thing. I have reasons that I need to use Windows. Though that’s not to say I’m not pushing for more Linux. Windows 11 is a big enough reason to ditch windows.

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Now? The writing was on the wall years ago. Support has already taken a nosedive, and they've basically all but stopped selling anything except to the biggest customers.

[-] 0xF21D@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago

I never needed to contact support for VMWare Workstation and when I did have a problem forums helped. So I didn’t notice. I did however notice when this whole Broadcom thing started taking shape and now it’s more obvious than before.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 10 points 1 year ago

Give Proxmox a burl, very nice.

My biggest qualm with switching to proxmox is how painful it is to convert VMs. We have some VMs with multiple TBs of storage.

In order to move you have to install the drivers first, shut down the VM, copy the files over (slowly), convert the VM (takes forever even on a 6 drive NVME raid array), before creating a new VM with matching settings then booting and it finally will work. And if you forgot the drivers then you have to find a storage controller that works, boot up, install the driver, then shut down and change the settings.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

well that's gonna be a beast you face anyway - it'd also happen if you had to implement your worst case DRP.

I'm not saying it's gonna be hassle free, but uh, you're migrating your infrastructure. It's gonna be a big job.

VMware makes it easy. You can live migrate a physical (or virtual) machine to VMware. Then just shut down the physical machine and turn on the VM. But apparently nothing like this exists for proxmox.

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

There's a vmware converter

[-] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can skip the disk convert step and mount the vmdk files directly. Then after bootup you can use the move disk feature to live convert the disk type.

[-] Mereo@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Proxmox to the rescue.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

XCP-ng is a good alternative. ProxMox is good for home labs.

[-] 0xF21D@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks I will check those out.

[-] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

I tend to draw the line around the 500 VMs mark and whether you use hyper-converged hardware. Above 500 VMs you are likely to be using dedicated storage, where XCP-ng will scale more easily.

Proxmox makes hyper-converged management simpler than XCP-ng and can handle more complex networking setups out of the box.

But there is a pretty large overlap between their capabilities.

[-] pelya@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Do they have other products aside from their premium Virtualbox skin?

this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
254 points (99.6% liked)

News

23406 readers
1773 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS