70
submitted 1 year ago by Nath@aussie.zone to c/australia@aussie.zone
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tess@mastodon.social 4 points 1 year ago

@Nath @Zagorath

Oh gosh, I think you just put your finger on something really important at the intersection of a few different parts of the conversation about privilege!

(Pardon me, I'm having a moment.)

There's that anecdote (I wish I had the source!) about how when a white woman looks in the mirror she sees a woman, but when a Black woman looks in the mirror, she sees a Black woman.

...

[-] NilaJones@zeroes.ca 3 points 1 year ago

@tess @Nath @Zagorath

I very much appreciate the talk about baseline in this thread!

[-] tess@mastodon.social 3 points 1 year ago

And so, when a white woman thinks about privilege, because she doesn't see her own race (since she is the societal "default") she only thinks about the ways men are given advantages over her.

Whereas the Black woman also sees the way that white women and men of all races are given advantages.

And a disabled, queer Black woman... you get the picture.

So "privileged relative to what?" is based entirely on the individual's experience and perspective ๐Ÿ™ƒ

...

@Nath @Zagorath

[-] tess@mastodon.social 3 points 1 year ago

And this is obviously BAD because it means any time you talk to a straight, able-bodied white man who hasn't actively unpacked all of this about privilege, he's immediately going to think about all the ways he's disadvantaged relative to his own baseline, which is, what? Tall, handsome, rich white men.

When you mention privilege, he feels attacked because he immediately thinks of all the ways in which he lacks it, not the ways he has it.

...

@Nath @Zagorath

[-] tess@mastodon.social 3 points 1 year ago

This dovetails with the "I didn't notice the sexism therefore it didn't happen" problem - he's probably not tuned into the difficulties people lower on the pecking order experience at all.

He has no realistic baseline.

It doesn't excuse his ignorance, but it *does* explain why, from a political standpoint, starting the conversation with privilege *rather than* starting with the challenges faced by other people might be a poor approach, because it engenders defensiveness.

...

@Nath @Zagorath

[-] tess@mastodon.social 3 points 1 year ago

...and perhaps, none of us have a realistic baseline. I certainly don't have firsthand knowledge of every way to be marginalized!

However, I still think "privilege" when applied correctly is a useful construct. I need to mull this over more in my head to figure out how and when, though. Like, what is the approach that is actually gonna change hearts and minds (or sway organizations struggling with this stuff)?

Thanks for letting me ramble in your mentions.

@Nath @Zagorath

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for letting me ramble in your mentions.

Unfortunately Lemmy doesn't seem to have username mentions working quite as effectively as it should. So I didn't get any notifications. But there was some interesting discussion between you two Mastadoners. Thanks for sharing!

[-] ajsadauskas@aus.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@Zagorath @tess This is a very interesting discussion, so thanks for all the ramblings in the mentions ๐Ÿ˜Š

Here's a couple of my ramblings. (And I'll preface them by acknowledging my own privilege.)

First, too often discussions about discrimination are framed in terms of individual moral virtue. An act of discrimination is framed as simply a personal vice of the racist or the misogynist. If only the bad people stopped choosing to behave badly, it would all be solved.

Enough Twitter pile-ons against enough bad people, and we solve it for good.

But we are not just individuals. We are citizens. We are part of a society. And discrimination is a problem with our society.

It's not just individual actions. It's the inequitable distribution of power and resources. The discrimination is embedded in the structures of social, political, economic, cultural, and institutional power.

For every individual bigot, there's whole social structures standing behind them.

Second, when it comes to privilege and discrimination, most of us are sitting somewhere in the middle.

Sure, there are some intergenerationally wealthy neurotypical cishet white men who are born with basically a guaranteed life in the top 1%, who have never experienced any discrimination of any form. Someone like Lachlan Murdoch is a great example.

At the other end, there are elderly working-class neurodiverse queer Black women with multiple chronic health conditions and disabilities, who society screws over at every turn.

The rest of us are, to varying degrees, somewhere in-between. Privileged in some ways, discriminated against in others.

(And yes, even if you're a neurotypical cishet white guy, if you're not in the 1%, you are still in that middle ground.)

So there's a simple choice for us to make: what kind of society we want to live in.

We can choose to align ourselves with the powerful, uphold the system as it stands, at the cost of continuing to experience the forms of discrimination we currently face.

We can choose to uphold the system, while only working to change the forms of discrimination we experience personally.

Or we can be empathetic, and seek to make our society equitable โ€” including ending the forms of discrimination we don't personally experience.

Ultimately, it's our choice what kind of society we want to live in.

[-] NilaJones@zeroes.ca 2 points 1 year ago

@tess @Nath @Zagorath

Yes. The way I was first taught about privilege, begins with saying that everyone has some ways in which they are privileged in some ways in which they are not

And a little exercise, where everyone in the room thinks about the ways in which they are not privileged. Because those always come to our mind more easily than the ways in which we are privileged!

The ways in which we are, that is the second exercise

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Sounds like you're describing whiteness theory.

this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
70 points (85.7% liked)

Australia

3622 readers
149 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS