39
Chevron, Exxon Opt Out of Funding COP28 Methane-Reduction Fund
(www.bloomberg.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
39 points (100.0% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5237 readers
287 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
To be honest, I don't really get why there needs to be a fund to support gas/oil companies in finding methane leaks and stopping flaring. These companies are effectively burning/emitting some of their own potential profits. I find it hard to believe that national gas/oil companies would be so cash-starved that they couldn't finance a straightforward way to secure additional profits from existing sites. Am I missing something?
I have no doubt the bottom line is king to them, which surely must imply that the cost of plugging the leaks exceeds the value of the fuel they would recover.
What I don’t get is why they are not being forced to plug the leaks at their own cost. Seems to showcase that regulation is an embarrassment.