101
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by FinnFooted@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HRDS_654@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I know a lot of people (not here necessarily) have been commenting on how these were rich people, but regardless of their financial situation they were just people first. I don't know anything about them and that being the case I'm going with this being a tragedy. I feel for the families that were left behind.

[-] camaradeboina@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

TBH what gets me angry is the fact literally less than a week before the single biggest sea faring tragedy that hit the Mediterranean sea, and easily one of the top 20 straight up sea tragedy in recent memory happened and literally nobody gave nor is giving a shit.

A boat full of migrants sunk between Greece and Italy, 80 have been confirmed dead, more than 500 are missing, and the worst is, the boat was being surveilled the entire time by Frontex and the Greek coast guard who straight up lied (or chose not to see) the distress the ship was in.

I can understand people lashing out at the death of rich people driven largely by their hubris and trusting a downright irresponsible psycho. In some way its a shadenfreude-like feeling over the overt and indirect violence that average people experience compared to that of the rich. It's distasteful to be sure, but it is what it is. In an unjust society both the exploitor and the exploited are pushed to brutish, revengeful, detached feelings towards one another and broader ressentiment. The solution is the end of exploitation.

[-] HuskyRacoon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

You're correct. I feel far worse for the refugees than the billionaires in the sub. But that being said i feel awful for the 19 year old on that ship. I know i would have said yes too because how many people can say "im going on holiday to the titanic" sounds great in concept. He may have been a rich kid but still a kid.

[-] bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

He is 19, he should be old enough to come to a reasonable conclusion that his family if profiting off of the suffering of the Pakistani people. He lived overseas, far away from the problem and I bet if you find his social media pages they are full of expensive things that you would never be able to get in Pakistan.

[-] graphite@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

He is 19, he should be old enough to come to a reasonable conclusion that his family if profiting off of the suffering of the Pakistani people.

No, he shouldn't be. You really have no idea what you're talking about.

[-] bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

And you know so much more than be because?

[-] graphite@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Because your mom, bro

[-] sculptordwarf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So it's not ok to care that a kid died because of some nebulous idea about stuff his dad has done? I'm sure there's at least a grain of truth in what you've said but that's still a pretty toxic worldview in my opinion.

[-] mombi@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I'm out of the loop, can you explain what you mean when you specify Pakistani people? I've read very little about this incident as I think many have, only learning about it incidentally when happening across posts like this.

[-] bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

The 19 year old everyone is so sad about, his father is very high up in the leadership of the largest company in Pakistan. Most people here seem to have no clue about how impoverish countries work, but for one person/family to accumulate so much wealth when the people of that country are very poor mean they are exploiting the people and the resources of the country for their own gain.

I don’t think people would be so upset about the young adult if this was a child from the Sachmans, or the Waltons.

[-] gila@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

If we're gonna gatekeep the rationale of feeling conflicted over a young person's death because they've crossed a benchmark where they're supposed to be aware that the environment they're a product of is exploitative and reject that, I think that benchmark should be older than 19. When I was 19 I was a fucking idiot

[-] bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Once you are 18, you are expected to be able to take care of yourself to some degree and think for yourself. And as he comes from a very rich family, I find it hard to believe that he isn’t educated in a good school (non secondary). Should we also raise the voting age everywhere as well if all 19 year old are fucking idiots?

[-] gila@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No, they should totally be allowed to vote, because they are represented by government. But it should be expected that their vote is to some degree shaped by the inherent perspective of a developing brain, which is fine.

[-] Esjee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

No point in having this discussion with someone who's already blinded by hate, just because a kid was lucky enough to be born in a better family than him

[-] gila@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Sure, I don't want to go too off-topic, but as an 'eat the rich' kinda guy myself, I wanna challenge my own opinions to be logically consistent.

[-] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You're a very reasonable person with a seemingly good degree of introspection, please don't stop. We need more people like you.

[-] mombi@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I see, thank you for explaining further. Agreed with the Sachman and Walton sentiment. 19 is certainly old enough to know what your father does, and with his wealth and no doubt stellar education he could start his own cushy life without using his dad's exploitation money.

[-] bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Exactly! There are so many 19 year olds who are inspirational to the people around him, and he could have chosen to be one of them. But instead he was living the fancy life he wanted.

[-] ComeScoglio@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

As a rule, I don't compare tragedies by the number of bodies, but I agree with you. It's distasteful, but it is what it is.

It reminds me of the devastating floods in Pakistan that got some attention for sure, but nothing compared to the billions of dollars that was donated within hours of the Notre Dame fire.

[-] wwaxwork@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The main difference here is their families had the money to fund the publicity and search efforts. The Refugees on that boat that sunk didn't have anyone rich that cared about them.

this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
101 points (93.2% liked)

World News

38978 readers
1393 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS