134
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GaimDS@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

I don't believe it for a second ngl 🫠

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I believe it, but only as a cost saving measure. By enabling e2ee they can wiggle out of having to deal with warrants and the government. It's about reducing the burden on their data retention and reporting teams.

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I don't believe there's ever been an instance of E2EE Messenger texts being given to law enforcement, whereas there are plenty of instances where Facebook has provided law enforcement with non-encrypted messages after being served a warrant.

Believe what you want, but ignoring the legal liability from blatantly lying like that, there's precisely zero evidence that Messenger's encryption is compromised.

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

The encryption doesn't have to be compromised when their app does the message scanning before encrypting.

Technically it's still E2EE

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

Sure, but at that point, it's a legitimate question of what goal you're trying to satisfy with E2EE. This doesn't prevent metadata analysis being used for marketing purposes - and if that's something you're strongly against, that's perfectly fair - but it does make it completely impossible for message content to be provided to law enforcement, even in the face of a warrant. That is hugely powerful, because we've already seen cases of FB Messenger texts being used to go after women who get abortions, just for one example. In countries with truly oppressive governments, that benefit can't be overstated.

Sure, Facebook will try to sell you some shit, but they're not going to send the police to arrest you. Having E2EE is a strict improvement over the status quo, and if you do care deeply about privacy on the more commercial side, there's always Signal or other privacy-first services.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago

Nothing technically would prevent that, but eventually that evidence would end up in public court and the ruse would be up.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
134 points (90.4% liked)

Technology

58133 readers
4508 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS