49
submitted 9 months ago by igalmarino@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 20 points 9 months ago

This is really disappointing. I had hoped for a lot more representation for the AGPL and GPL.

[-] TootSweet@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

I'm glad to hear I'm not the only one who feels that way. I use GPL3.0 and AGPL3.0 exclusively. AGPL for anything that makes sense. Anything that'll be used over a network, basically. And GPL for things that aren't used over a network.

There are things I wish in retrospect I'd made AGPL rather than GPL. But I think copyleft is a fuckin' great thing that ought to be used more. For non-code works (3d-printable models, mostly), I also like the Creative Commons share alike licenses. I usually go for CC BY-SA. I'm fine with commercial use mostly as long as it's only used in things that aren't going to deprive the end user of the same rights that the seller got from me. And I very much want to encourage remixes/derivative works.

[-] duncesplayed@lemmy.one 4 points 9 months ago

Whenever I'm started anything new, I just go AGPL without even thinking about it. If I later change my mind and think GPL or LGPL or BSD or something would be more appropriate later, I can always change it (though I've never found a need to), but you can't really go the other way. If you start permissive, that's just out there, forever.

this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
49 points (96.2% liked)

Open Source

30379 readers
561 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS