183
submitted 11 months ago by DannyMac@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

I think the issue is a bit more than the DEA not wanting to move, and it's also related to how many studies showing positive effects of psychedelics have severe methodological or other important issues. This podcast summarizes some of those issues very nicely in case anyone's interested: https://www.thestudiesshowpod.com/p/episode-4-psychedelics

[-] IDontHavePantsOn@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

I'll listen to the podcast because I'm sure there's info in it that will be new to me, but I do know drug scheduling creates a purgatory that makes substances difficult to research. When the scheduling means that it can't be produced in amounts to create meaningful clinical studies, the "drugs with no currently accepted medical use" definition is difficult to get out of.

To add on to that, if John Hopkins research labs, the same one that came up with CPR, water purification, and genetic engineering, thinks psilocybin has medical use and merit, I believe them.

this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
183 points (97.4% liked)

science

14595 readers
55 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS