193
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

Yes, I totally agree, but a few months isn't enough.

I'm of the belief that the consequences of a crime should never be shorter than the effect it had on the victim.

Someone who's been assaulted at their place of work may develop ongoing trauma beyond a few months. It's unfair to the victim if they have to suffer longer than the instigator.

[-] pineapple_santa@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That’s just thinly veiled revenge justice. It’s not a good doctrine for a humane (or working) society.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't see it as revenge justice, but more like siding with victims.

You can't "rehabilitate" an abuser by having them work 60 or 90 days as a fast food worker. It could be part of a broader, long-term strategy to turn a horrible person into a normal one, but that doesn't seem to be what's happened here.

this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
193 points (98.5% liked)

Work Reform

9856 readers
131 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS