622
submitted 11 months ago by jroid8@lemmy.world to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 15 points 11 months ago

For the love of god, please do not use single-line alternatives to braced scopes. It's only tolerable in lambdas like Array.map( v => v**2 ). It's not for an implicit scope. It's for evaluating a return value.

But holy shit is it nice to have ?. in Javascript. It's such an anything-goes language until you look at it funny and it just shits the bed and silently dies. Hate hate haaate having to check if things exist, when so many other details fail politely and impact nothing. At least now it's one extra character instead of try-catch rigmarole.

[-] PoolloverNathan@programming.dev 9 points 11 months ago

I'm fine with non-braced blocks, but they must always be on the same line as the parent statement (e.g. if (a != null) return a) to visually distinguish them. (inb4 argument about long conditions: they'd usually be spread out over several lines, and the statement would go on the closing parenthese (which is on a line by itself when split over multiple lines))

[-] BehindTheBarrier@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago

We avoid that, because just at a glance you might not see the function flow change when returns are at the end of lines. It's a minor thing of course.

[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Inb4 the JavaScript fanboys appear and argue a bad tool is fine if you're a genius, actually. Why aren't you a genius?

this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
622 points (96.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

32509 readers
466 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS