268
submitted 11 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

"You must be a legal resident of Iowa and the precinct you live in and bring a photo ID with you to participate," the state Republican party said on Friday in a post on the social media platform X.

The party is scheduled to hold local gatherings, known as the Iowa Caucus, on Jan. 15 in which participants will vote for their choice for the Republican candidate to run in November’s presidential election. U.S. President Joe Biden is expected to be the Democratic Party’s nominee.

The state Republican Party posted its reminder after Casey DeSantis, appearing on Fox News with her husband, the governor of Florida, called on women from across the country to join the gatherings, saying, “You do not have to be a resident of Iowa to participate."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world -5 points 11 months ago

Nothing on that list is a right, but the point is you have to have photo ID to function as a basic adult in this country, forget voting. Just going into the world, having a job and a bank account requires identification.

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 8 points 11 months ago

CmdrShepard’s argument here is important - you are looking at the burden to you, not the burden to the least capable person. Voting should be free to all. If you begin to argue that people who can’t get an ID shouldn’t vote, you should also be okay with me setting income requirements above your income for voting (I do quite well). That’s the slippery slope that people are arguing against. Everyone should be able to vote, full stop.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

We already have an ID requirement, it's a signature. If your signature doesn't match, you have to correct it or your vote isn't counted.

Here, the signature used, is the one from your state drivers license or ID card...

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 8 points 11 months ago

So you want to restrict voting to those individuals who only have a job and a bank account? That sure sounds familiar. Do you also think voters should have to pass a written test before exercising their right to vote too?

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

No, I'm saying the number of people who a) want to vote but b) don't take part in any other sort of adult life due to not having ID is incredibly low.

[-] Whattrees@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Maybe you missed the everyone in the previous post. It doesn't matter if it's two people in the country (it's likely at least a million, that would be less than 0.3%), no one eligible should not be able to vote.

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 3 points 11 months ago

Okay? So once again, are you saying it doesn't matter if you discriminate against someone's rights as long as they're a minority? It's like we're reliving the 1800s-1960s with each one of your comments.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I'm not advocating for discrimination, I'm saying I doubt that there are any reasonable number of adults who want to vote but can't due to a lack of ID when you need to have ID to do literally anything else in adult society.

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
268 points (97.9% liked)

News

23301 readers
1025 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS