213
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

The Saudi delegation has flatly opposed any language in a deal that would even mention fossil fuels — the oil, gas and coal that, when burned, create emissions that are dangerously heating the planet. Saudi negotiators have also objected to a provision, endorsed by at least 118 countries, aimed at tripling global renewable energy capacity by 2030.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xilliah@beehaw.org 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Well they already live in a desert so what do they have to lose? And they're rich enough to be able to afford all kinds of tech.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 7 points 11 months ago

They already import 80% of their food and 40% of the water they consume is not replenishing. That is besides being in an already unstable region of the world, which would become largely uninhabitable with climate change going on further. So when oil either runs out or they can not sell it anymore, they are in a really bad spot.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There's a guy where I live who's been working for over a decade with Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Dubai, designing and implementing huge investments into renewables, especially solar. They are also investing huge sums into dessalination technology and solar furnaces.

They have some plan up their sleeves and I guess everyone will be taken off hand when it will be made public.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

They have a big PR operation about their small solar investments. So far as I can tell, that's it, and not some kind of serious attempt to become a large-scale energy exporter based on renewables.

The Saudi plan is largely a sovereign wealth fund, intended to use the rest of the world as an income stream for the royal family after the oil is done.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz -2 points 11 months ago

The person is there working 6 to 8 months a year, a renewables engineer, seeing first hand a part of what is being planned for a near future but understanding the real scale goes way beyond what reaches their eyes and ears.

Unless a full behind the scenes information leak happens, I'm going to give credit to first hand knowledge.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 months ago
[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz -2 points 11 months ago

Let us poletely keep to our positions and live amiably with one another.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 11 months ago

Temperatures which go from unpleasant to deadly

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
213 points (99.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5205 readers
655 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS