638
submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tygerprints@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

Everyone I know has some kind of medical debt. Even my doctor said he ignores his medical bills, who doesn't. What can you do, when you need medical help and insurance won't pay for it. Personally I feel that if someone is chronically ill with a debilitating illness, the most humane thing we can do is allow them the choice of assisted suicide.

I think we should do the "Soylent Green" thing. Remember that movie? When someone is too sick, old, or just tired of life, they have the choice of going into a state-run facility where they go into a bed and slowly assisted into death - and their body is used to make more food for other people. I mean, why not - protein is protein and why not solve hunger and pain at the same time.

[-] tmyakal@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago

Personally I feel that if someone is chronically ill with a debilitating illness, the most humane thing we can do is allow them the choice of assisted suicide.

I think the most humane thing to do would be to treat them with the best care we as a society can provide without forcing them into massive debt.

[-] tygerprints@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

Well sure, if you want to be all humane and LOGICAL about it. (rolls eyes). That would be the best option if it is available - but I've seen many patients forced to endure horrible protracted processes of dying without the means to afford any better outcome (and there are some who even the best treatments just can't help).

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

The most logical thing would be to eat the rich.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

Tax them first, proportional to gross income.

(You know, like America in the '40s . Do they know that's one of the few Greats America was, and thus one of the few things they can Make it Again?)

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

Even like in the fifties would be great!

[-] tygerprints@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

Yes but there's so much fat to trim away. I think we should give all people a chance to be "at the table." I mean what's wrong with human meat? Ounce per ounce it's more nutritious than the same amount of chicken or beef. Ask the survivors of the Andes' plane wreck.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

We’d have to cook it to the texture of shoe-leather, to make sure to kill whatever yuck that might be in them.

That said, something isn’t right with my body; I’m not tolerating meat well, lately. Considering vegan but not sure how to get plenty of protein, and I do love dairy, which is still less expensive than almond/oat milk (which I like well enough).

[-] Cosmocrat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

We could grind them up and turn them into biodiesel!

[-] tygerprints@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

That's also a possibility, or use the gristle for cattle feed or something. But why not make Soylent Green energy drinks and festive human jerky snacks? Why let all that good meat go to the worms?

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

Then we pollute the air more. I’m pretty sure there is zero use for billionaires and multimillionaires. Deprogramming and re-education, probably by putting them in crap pay service industry positions, slum dwellings and taking away their toys, including internet and television, and probably telephones that dial more than emergency services.

[-] tygerprints@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

Actually human meat has no more yuck to it than chicken or beef, but I get what you're saying. Though the survivors of the Andes (the soccer team that crashed and ended up eating their dead teammates) have said that, if they went through such a thing again, they wouldn't hesitate to eat raw human flesh - it was the only thing that kept them from total starvation.

But if we were to market human meat in a palatable way - pasteurized and cooked to whatever temp to make sure it's safe - I don't see why it should be abhorrent to think about eating it. Think of the possibilities - instead of spam you could have Sam and eggs. (sorry bad joke.........)

[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

where they go into a bed and slowly assisted into death

Nah. I'll take quick and painless. Which also gets into that protein thing. Even today, in a round about way, we all end up eventually as someone else's food. So may as well take a few middlemen out of the equation and just puree people into McChicken filler.

[-] tygerprints@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Well I'd probably take the quick and painless route if I had to make a choice.

But in the movie, it's entirely painless and the patient gets to watch a cool movie with beautiful music as they are slowly ushered into the "other world." I think that idea of it being painless and kind of beautiful would make it a lot less dire of an experience (though I like the idea of 25 cent Suicide Booths - there's something about the silliness of having to use a quarter to make it work - just another bit of randomness that makes the necessity of suicide booths more appealing).

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
638 points (99.2% liked)

News

23287 readers
1272 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS