638
submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thantik@lemmy.world 48 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You don't have to wonder any longer. You've figured it out. Take the morality out of many political decisions and you have the right answer. Abortions? -- nobody gives a shit about those children. It's a convenient cover so they don't have to say "Mothers are killing the thing that we will enslave and drain later on in the economy!" Everyone says that they care about the child until it's born -- they don't even care before that point. And the lack of care/suffering/poverty of the child afterwards is the point of exploitation. So the system is working as intended. They need more workers, they need to siphon every ounce of production out of those workers.

[-] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 months ago

Abortions? – nobody gives a shit about those children. It’s a convenient cover so they don’t have to say “Mothers are killing the thing that we will enslave and drain later on in the economy!"

What sort of purpose does it serve to force a woman to carry a pregnancy to term when the fetus has a Fatal fetal abnormality?

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

It's for the useful idiots who follow these politicians to believe that those politicians' choices are driven by moral principles rather than cold personal upside maximization and a sociopathic disregard for others: for appearances' sake, same as going around kissing babies and shaking the hands of people they look down on.

This might sound crazy to any normal person because normal people wouldn't sacrifice others like that merely for the sake of "the message", but sociopaths don't feel any guilt or shame when they hurt or harm others, so they're capable of sacrificing others to quite an extreme level merelly for some minor benefits to themselves, if the victims are powerless to reciprocate (which in this case they are).

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

What sort of purpose does it serve to force a woman to carry a pregnancy

One sterile woman is a good exchange for 10 babies born in poverty who will join the Army.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The policy creates orphans more than it creates a population boom. And eventually people do find ways to prevent/stop pregnancies they're just more dangerous and you see small bump in births then they go down as women die. With more women dying on their 3rd or 4th child then you get more kids who are ophaned.

The strategic problem is nobody wants orphans so what happens? They get abused or fend for themselves and become unstable. Ain't many of them going to join the army.

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago

None of those details matter. More meat for the grinder is all they care about.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What I'm saying tho is the bump is negligable and small, if it exists at all for abortion. Its actually the fight against schools and education that will bring meat for the meat grinder.

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
638 points (99.2% liked)

News

23287 readers
1272 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS