2459

nuff said

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AChiTenshi@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

Perhaps. But a rather large issue arises when your content is generated primarily by users who wouldn't want to pay for a service.

There is also the issue where if you are having to pay to get around interaction limits is it really free speech? Or just limited to those that can afford to pay?

[-] traveler01@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

I think these limits were increased to a point where they are not really bad or they were removed. The point of them was to prevent scraping to train AIs

[-] Techmaster@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Imagine using Twitter to train AI. "Why is my AI such an asshole!?"

[-] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

I'd argue it's a poisoned dataset. You can't validly train an AI based on content that contains a non-trivial percentage of bot-generated content.

[-] traveler01@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Could be meant more like to influence elections…

this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
2459 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59559 readers
2238 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS