694
submitted 11 months ago by lettruthout@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net

“The rich gazed at their superyachts, and decided they were not enough. The new breed of megayachts, which are at least 70 metres (230ft) in length, may be the most expensive moveable assets ever created.”

“First and foremost, owning a megayacht is the most polluting activity a single person can possibly engage in. Abramovich’s yachts emit more than 22,000 tonnes of carbon every year, which is more than some small countries. Even flying long-haul every day of the year, or air-conditioning a sprawling palace, would not get close to those emissions levels.

The bulk of these emissions happen whether or not a yacht actually travels anywhere. Simply owning one – or indeed building one – is an act of enormous climate vandalism.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Maeve@kbin.social 42 points 11 months ago
[-] hansl@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

Per person, cruise ships are probably a couple of order of magnitude better than mega yacht… but yeah both are good.

I’d love to see cruise sail ships.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Sailing is hard work on a two-person vessel; World fare be a nominal fee plus n hours of labor? Sign me up!

[-] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago

Sailing is hard work on a two-person vessel;

Why do you say two-person vessel specifically? Are there no automated sail boats on the small scale?

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 11 months ago

Small scale you don’t really benefit from automation, it’s just more that can go wrong.

[-] Schnabeltierpoet@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

I mean, in theory you could equip all the winches with electric motors, but for me it would just take part of the fun away

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

I don’t know, but would they be cleaner and greener? I specified two-person because that’s the last boat on which I sailed. It was a long time ago.

[-] activistPnk@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I just asked because you said it was hard work on a 2 person vessel. I don’t sail so I was just wondering why that would be. Is it labor intensive with moving the sails, or more mentally fatiguing to constantly calculate where to position sails? I’ve not so seriously considered crossing the Altantic (which I heard requires a year of preparation). So to the question as to whether an automated sailboat for two would be greener, I would say /yes/ to the extent that it might encourage more people to sail.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

To me, the mental part is easy, but I suppose it would depend on how familiar one is with the winds and tides. It is extremely labor intensive.

[-] LwL@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Cruise ships aren't all that much worse than long haul flights (specifics gonna depend on the ship and the plane but my first google results ended up with a 14 day cruise being roughly equivalent to four transatlantic flights) purely in terms of co2, just bc there are so many people on board. Though flights also need to cut emissions by a lot really, so that's still not great. And cruise ships tend to use fuel that releases other harmful chemicals beyond just greenhouse gases.

Still, to particularly focus on them rather than just one of many things that need to be reduced and also made more efficient feels a bit misplaced to me. Though I'd imagine that if sail container ships actually prove viable, sail cruise ships might follow.

[-] tankplanker@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

They are already experimenting with adding sails back to cruise ships, the potential cost savings should be enough to get the companies to change on their own.

I say this as an avid sailing but the downside of sails is that you cannot rely on them to get you where you need to go on an exact day, which is kind of the point for modern cruise ships. However if they can use them for the long haul passages then that at least will get away from the heavy oil that they tend to burn away from shore, although some still burn it close to shore even though they are not meant to.

I cannot see them getting away from having to use motive power of some description to drive props but electric drive does look promising for cruise ships, lots of ways to charge batteries for that.

The other problem with cruise ships is the local environmental impact of dropping that number of tourists at once on a single location, but cutting back mass tourism is a much trickier problem to deal with.

[-] Setnof@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago
[-] Maeve@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

Commercial? Private? We’re going to have to work hard on teleportation. From my understanding, disassembly isn’t the problem; reassembly is.

[-] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works -4 points 11 months ago

Start with cruise ships if you please.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 4 points 11 months ago

Some of these megayachts are the size of a cruise ship, but only for one dude and his family. Hence all the pollution just for a handfull of people, who do not even use it most of the year.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago

I’m cool with that.

this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
694 points (98.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5222 readers
715 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS