242
submitted 1 year ago by DevCat@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The Supreme Court has been asked to weigh in on a question that will decide if the former president faces charges for efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

WASHINGTON (CN) — The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to review a fast-tracked petition asking if Donald Trump can use his status as a former president to claim immunity from criminal charges related to his effort to overturn the 2020 election.

The order came only hours after Special Counsel Jack Smith asked the justices to expedite consideration of Trump’s presidential immunity claim in his D.C. prosecution for election interference leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection. The decision is not an agreement to hear Smith's case, but rather an agreement to review his petition faster than normal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago

Immunity while head of state? Sounds like a monarchy to me.

[-] DevCat@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

And if SCOTUS says the President is an absolute monarch? What would you want Biden to do next? The GQP just never thinks this through.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

And if SCOTUS says the President is an absolute monarch? What would you want Biden to do next?

Use his powers as monarch to remove the justices that gave him such power, then abdicate back down to president.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

It would be in the most Biden way possible too. Dissolve the current court, instate mildly progressive liberals, and order a reruling to remove his power

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Could we also have him set term limits on the new court and get rid of lifetime appointments?

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Ah, but then it wouldn't be the Biden way. He goes just far enough to be disappointed he didn't go all in

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Those sufficiently mild, respectable new justices would have to immediately step down if they were themselves uncorrupted

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Arrest the bunch of them. "The Republican party is hereby disbanded, arrests begin in 5 minutes."

(throwback for the kids in the room):

https://youtu.be/CFCABnWlN8E

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Can't believe that this became an international faux pas. Reagan was absolutely a spawn of Satan, but come on. Unless "We begin bombing in 5 minutes" was broadcasted live (the report says it was an audio test) there's no way it should be read as anything other than gallows humor.

[-] ourob@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago

Eh, gallows humor from a random nobody is one thing. Joking about basically ending the world as we know it from someone who literally has the power to end the world as we know it is another.

This faux pas is certainly not at the top of my list of criticisms of Reagan, but he did deserve some shit for it.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You make a great point. But at the same time, there's so much meme potential

[-] chakan2@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The GQP absolutely thought this through...Biden either won't have the balls to do anything about this, or he croaks trying to actually accomplish something.

This is the checkmate they've been working at since Bush Jr.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not at all.. Trump wasn't born into his position. This is fascism, friend.

Edit: I mean, he was born into money, though...

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure most of them don't even have that anymore

this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
242 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19237 readers
1218 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS