307
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A former Bay Area tech CEO was fired earlier this year after allegedly enslaving, torturing, and sexually abusing his assistant. He claims the pair had a consensual relationship that people would "celebrate" if it were fictitious.

Former Tradeshift CEO Christian Lanng denied the allegations levied against him and the billion-dollar company he co-founded that were made by a former employee in court Thursday.

"The shocking and vile claims in the lawsuit are categorically false, and I reject allegations that I subjected someone to any form of abuse during my tenure as CEO or at any other time of my life,” Lanng told The Messenger.

In the complaint, an unidentified woman alleged that Lanng sent her into “a dark abyss of unwanted sexual horror," according to The Mercury News.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Based on being together before she was hired. That is literally the opposite of baseless.

He could very likely be very wrong in his assumptions - and they are assumptions - but definitely based on information provided.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

... but definitely based on information provided.

Then look around for more info.

He acknowledged the inappropriateness of hiring someone he was romantically involved with, calling it a "grave error of judgment," but refuted any claims of abuse or harassment. Source

Bryan Freedman, the plaintiff’s lawyer, denied Doe and Lanng ever dated. Source

Filed with the lawsuit was the alleged nine-page slave contract that appears to have Lanng’s signature. Source

The woman accused Lanng of trafficking her across countries including the United Kingdom, Singapore, and Japan, trips during which she was allegedly “sexually assaulted, including being bound against her will and beaten to the point of bleeding.” Source

[-] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Huh? What is your point? We both agree that they are assumptions, and I wasn't commenting on the accuracy of them. They could be wildly inaccurate.

Only that they weren't "baseless". They were based in something. That's it. End of discussion.

Everything you've posted are just different bases for different assumptions - it doesn't negate the basis, just changes the accuracy of them.

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

But of course lemmy gives a rapey CEO the benefit of the doubt when it comes to abusing a woman. Any other topic and they'd be shitting on him. Fucking disgusting.

[-] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de -3 points 2 years ago

The phrase "baseless assumptions" does not mean that no base was provided. It means that the purported base is inadequate to support a causal likelihood that the assumptions are true.

Besides which, your argument is one of semantics, which you're welcome to.

[-] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

False and a lie.

this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
307 points (97.8% liked)

News

35714 readers
677 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS