43
submitted 10 months ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Adkml@hexbear.net 18 points 10 months ago

To be clear didn't read any of that horseshit past your first sentence because clearly it would be a waste of time.

So everybody has an idea of how much energy to waste trying to have conversations with you I wan a make this really clear. Are you saying there is no objective way to know whether or not Biden said he is a zionist who will fully support Isreal here?

Because if that's the case I think you're confusing "objective reality" for "literacy"

Because we're literally commenting on an article that directly quotes Joe Biden as saying that.

So unless you're saying what Biden says has no connection to reality (you could probably get somewhere with this but pretty sure that's not your point) not really sure what you're backup is.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Epistemic fallacy, non sequitur, strawman fallacy, goalpost moving.

His argumentation was clear in that it was directed at questioning one, and only one, attribute mentioned by you, specifically:

Then again Biden himself is not anymore progressive or any less Zionist than any Republican candidate, he is to the right of many of them. [emphasis mine]

You, on the other hand, argued for:

Then again Biden himself is not anymore progressive or any less Zionist than any Republican candidate, he is to the right of many of them. [emphasis mine]

Which is neither valid as a reply, nor is it relevant to the raised issue.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (44 replies)
this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
43 points (82.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7178 readers
798 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS