337
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by onlinepersona@programming.dev to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] toototabon@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

I don't think it's perceived as good? (curious, why would it be?) Just that it's disingenuous to market it as AI. Everyone and their mother now has """AI""" 🤷‍♂️

[-] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah, good is probably the wrong word, I mean "positive in the sense it shows AI can't replace humans".

[-] toototabon@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Oh, i get it! Yeah, 30% is a considerable percentage.

Where I work (text-based customer support), a few weeks ago I stumbled upon a spreadsheet analysing that they could "save" 25% in wages by implementing GPT-4.

It may still be mostly humans on the line, but 1 out 4 of us may get the boot.

this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
337 points (97.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

32415 readers
638 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS