605
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
605 points (95.4% liked)
Technology
60062 readers
1235 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
For me it's always been a dumb argument. There is no good argument for not having one
It costs maybe £2 to add a crappy DAC, amp, and headphone jack to a phone that is already ridiculously expensive.
The waterproof argument was destroyed by the S5, S6, S7, S8, and S9.
The iPhone 7 literally had the space inside for one!
It's also weird to me that a lot of budget phones have them. Like why would a £200 phone have a feature a £1,000+ phone doesn't?
Budget phones have them because wired earbuds or headphones are cheap: wired buds under $10. Last flight I was on gave them away for free. Harder to lose. If you're paying £1,000+ for a phone, the you're probably not worried about the cost of accessories. Might even put the style of no dangly wires over the functionality.
Once again not correct. Yes they will give away cheap earphones, but you can get TW earbuds for £15 easily these days. Also there are plenty of wired earphones that cost hundreds and in a few cases thousands of pounds. It's still taking away functionality and features when you remove it.
And to address the original apple argument of oh the headphone jack is old outdated tech( from the iPhone 7 announcement). Please go look up a chord Hugo 2 dac. And tell me what the output is. Why then does a over £1,000 dac/amp have a headphone jack.
It's a poor argument from a company that wants to sell you a bunch of dongles and airpods. Which has unfortunately mostly worked.
And don't even get me started on the 2016 macbooks which went down so poorly due to the oh you're just poor argument not working that they went back and added more ports on the newer ones.
I'm not poor I just want to use my £200 wired earphones with my phone without needing a dongle that's designed to break easier then a late 2012-2016 MacBook charger.
Too entitled to understand dividing markets by cost. Aesthetics trump functionality when your phone becomes a fashion accessory.
Why would you even waste studio headphones on a device with a $0.25 DAC and no space for signal isolation? Or is that just to signal fellow audiophiles.