69
Cycling Fallacies - Counters to Common Anti-Cycling Arguments
(cyclingfallacies.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
69 points (96.0% liked)
Bicycles
3121 readers
104 users here now
Welcome to !bicycles@lemmy.ca
A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!
Community Rules
-
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
-
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
-
No porn.
-
No ads / spamming.
-
Ride bikes
Other cycling-related communities
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Wow, this is awesome! I do wish that they'd list citations when mentioning studies in some of the explanations though. :)
Which ones? I haven't looked at all of them but a lot of them have a "Further Reading" section below, which is the citations.
The example below mentions studies from the Netherlands in the 70s and the USA in the 2010s. One paper is linked from the Dublin Institute of Technology and the other is a dead link.
https://cyclingfallacies.com/en/3/shopkeepers-rely-on-people-driving
I do appreciate that section at the bottom though!
Ah yea, could use some updating for sure. Good catch
I emailed the author to let them know. :)