387
submitted 10 months ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] espentan@lemmy.world 69 points 10 months ago

It feels like it's always the EU picking up the ball on these things. Aren't there mechanisms in place to monitor these things in the US, or is it legislation (or lack of it) that prevents the government from going after such things?

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

In the US, you always have to consider the benefits and risks to an elected official. Republicans would get nothing out of putting their new golden boy under a magnifier, but I'm certain that if a democrat tried it, they'd get slandered to hell and back.

The EU probably has no such concern. I don't know how the EC's members are picked, but partisanship is probably not as huge a factor. Eventually some EC members were bound to grow a backbone.

[-] Spendrill@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Also most of the EU members conduct business in their own language so they don't have to worry about Anglosphere media getting a hard-on for them.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
387 points (97.5% liked)

World News

32274 readers
493 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS