190
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by autismdragon@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] autismdragon@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

Obviously not. But opposing latam social democracies is often about that.

[-] CatratchoPalestino@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

yeah and the united states supported mexico when it nationalized its oil and gas in 1938 under the PRI and the saudis when it granted an oil concession in 1933 giving themselves majority share. sometimes the us is more interested in stability than higher profits

[-] autismdragon@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

Ok so latam social democracies arent inherently worthy of support just because they call themselves that. But id say they are when they materially oppose American control of their countries or when America opposes them or tries to interfere.

Doesnt sound like thats the case in Hondorus.

[-] CatratchoPalestino@hexbear.net 2 points 11 months ago

it’s not the case for any social democrats, they’re social democrats

[-] autismdragon@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

No global south socdem has ever opposed American control is questionable, but no global south socdem has ever been opposed or interfered with by America is just historically illiterate.

It sounds like you just think your country is every country.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
190 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13535 readers
948 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS