490
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by registrert@lemmy.sambands.net to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml

Made by Nume MacAroon at Veganism.social https://veganism.social/@nm

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

If the Fediverse is truly the architecture of the future, then shouldn't it be able to stand any attempt by Meta to control it? If Meta is able to control it, then isn't it the wrong solution?

[-] iridaniotter@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 10 months ago

No, projects like the Fediverse require initial protectionism. If you let megacorporations into your project, they will dominate and gain control over how the protocol develops in the future. Google Chrome's huge share of users has enabled it to get dangerously close to locking other browsers out of most of the Internet (the Web Integrity API shenanigans are just the start). Chrome also removed support for JPEG XL, killing that attempt at a standard and enshrining its own WebP. It's called "Embrace, extend, and extinguish".

If the Fediverse actually wants to grow, it must unite against this. Otherwise we will end up with a couple hundred thousand Fedipact hardliners and millions on Facebook 2. No progress will have been made.

load more comments (6 replies)
this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
490 points (95.5% liked)

Fediverse

17671 readers
18 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS