828
HP raising Instant Ink subscription pricing significantly
(www.ghacks.net)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
828 points (99.2% liked)
Technology
59381 readers
971 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I can't stand that term. "Reverse Racism" implies that Racism is supposed to go a specific direction. Anyone who uses it is Racist themselves.
It's just Racism. Like "de-evolution". It's just evolution numb-nuts!
I've never thought about it but you're right, anyone using that term is immediately telling on themselves.
I've always understood it to mean racism as a response to racism, like fighting fire with fire. You're not alone in your interpretation though, which is why it's such an unpopular term
That would be anti
The term "reverse racism" has been around for decades, a mis-application (sometimes intentional) to imply racism is automatically one way.
Would it though? People use the term anti-racist to mean they're against racism. How could you be racist and anti-racist at the same time?
People say reverse racism to call out the tactic of using racism to justify racism the other way. It's similar to the idea of hating everyone on the planet because a few people were mean to you.
I don't know. I feel like these guys were on to something.