723
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Young voters overwhelmingly say they would support President Biden over former President Trump in a hypothetical head-to-head match-up if the 2024 presidential election were held today, according to a poll released Wednesday.

In the Economist/YouGov poll — conducted via web-based interviews Dec. 16-18 — more than half (53 percent) of registered voters under 30 said they would support Biden, and less than a quarter (24 percent) said they would support Trump.

Another 10 percent said they would support another candidate, 4 percent said they were not sure, and 9 percent said they wouldn’t vote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I'm a big fan of Biden as a human being, and figured he'd do about the job he's currently doing given his skill at working in Congress.

His policies are generally, but not always, policies I agree with, so that clicked too.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Should I take that to mean:

  1. You weren't a fan of any of the other candidates as human beings?
  2. You figured they weren't up to the job?
  3. You didn't like their policies?

You need to be more specific here. These are really vague reasons.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

1: You weren’t a fan of any of the other candidates as human beings?

No I absolutely love Booker and Buttigiege especially.

2: You figured they weren’t up to the job?

No I just preferred Biden, especially with his history both in the Senate and as VP to Obama, dealing with a very hostile Congress as I expected he would during his term.

3: You didn’t like their policies?

I do not agree 100% with any politician's policies. I think Biden is way too protectionist, as an example of a place we agree in vision.

I figure he holds those views because of his passion for "the little guy" and his generalized support of unions, but it's a place we generally disagree. You gotta take the good with the bad. Shit, Buttigieg spoke in favor of rent control and I still like him a ton. He's a good guy. He can be wrong sometimes.

Booker has more views that I don't like than most, but damn if I don't like that he can get shit done with, again, heavily entrenched interests who hate one another. He never really had a shot, but I just like the dude.

Happy to answer any more questions.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

What I'm getting from this is you prefer "moderates" like Biden over progressives and leftists so you voted for Biden over everybody else because of that.

We are not on the same side.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago
[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

You're right. He's right of center.

We are not on the same side. You'd rather work with MAGA than compromise to the left.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I don't perceive us as having similar end desires, no, but the idea I'd rather side with people further from my views than closer is absurd, and born of the jealousy - you're angry that the norm is the norm and not your views. My support of Biden is proof of that - he's too protectionist, but Trump is far more protectionist, as an easy policy example.

If you want your ideas to be popular, consider trying to spread them positively.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

you’re angry that the norm is the norm and not your views

I'm not angry at all. I'm just not voting for Biden in 2024 and you're gonna be angry about that.

If you want your ideas to be popular, consider trying to spread them positively.

I've got a better idea: I'll stop propping up your shitty candidates until you're willing to compromise or this country collapses. I'm fine with either outcome.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I’m just not voting for Biden in 2024 and you’re gonna be angry about that.

I've told.you I don't care lol.

I’ll stop propping up your shitty candidates until you’re willing to compromise or this country collapses.

Nah. There aren't enough of you to matter.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Nah. There aren’t enough of you to matter.

Is that what you said in 2016?

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

No in 2016 I still had a lot of (now-delusional) hope that evangelicals wouldn't possibly vote for an insane boor of a man.

You didn't vote for Clinton in 16 lol

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago

You seem incapable of putting 2 and 2 together here.

this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
723 points (95.0% liked)

politics

19088 readers
1826 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS