18
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
18 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37573 readers
91 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
As long as sites can get zoom levels, it seems to me like you'll have to choose one or the other.
Now, if I'm not mistaken, the only way to do that, is via JavaScript, so disabling JS on a site should block that. Alternatively, block or sanitize the JS call used to calculate the canvas vs. window size (maybe via Tampermonkey?). Or just return a window size equal to the canvas size (I'm kind of surprised RFP doesn't do that).
which part of "no negotiations possible" do you not get?
I would like a more granular choice, acccessibility is not something I can give up, I don't care sites can fingerprint me with it
Right, so you basically want the opposite of CanvasBlocker?
@Mnglw and @jarfil , do either of you know how to implement the "removeparam" thingamabobber? I'm just about at the limits of what my poor brain can handle here . . . 🤯
Hm, which parameter would you want to get removed?
From what I can see, you can either specify a fixed parameter name, or use a REGEXP... I could help you write an optimized REGEXP if that's what you need, the example
/^utm_/one seems to target Google's tracking and be simple enough... but is that what you want to do?